Layers

US/Israel → Iran
Iran → Region
Civilian Casualty Site
Hezbollah / Lebanon
Carrier / Amphibious
Destroyer / Submarine
Hormuz Chokepoint
US Air Base
US Naval Base
Key Landmark
LATEST
$100.82
Brent Crude $/bbl
+42.0% since Feb 27 — hit $119 intraday on Gulf energy strikes; IEA reserves absorb shock
$96.50
WTI Crude $/bbl
+45.1% since Feb 27 — approached $100 intraday; 14.5-16.5 mbd shortfall persists
$3.86
US Gas Avg/Gal
+$0.88 / +29.5% since Feb 27 — 8 states above $4, 3 above $5 — diesel $5.07
6,617.89
S&P 500
-261 pts / -3.8% — 2026 closing low; Dow -768 pts; VIX 25.09
~$900M
Est. Daily US Cost
'Largest strike package yet' — Pentagon requests $200B+ supplemental
~$23.4B
Est. Total Cost (20 Days)
Pentagon $11.3B Day 6 + CSIS $16.5B Day 12 + $200B supplemental requested
Oil Price — Brent & WTI (2026)
Market Impact — Indexed to Feb 27 = 100
Strait of Hormuz — Daily Tanker Transits
Estimated Daily US Military Cost

How Much More Are YOU Paying?

$15.43
Additional Monthly Gas Cost Since War Began
0
Targets Struck
Loading...
0
US Military Deaths
Loading...
0
US Service Members WIA
Loading...
0
Iranian Killed (Hengaw est.)
Loading...
0
Lebanese Killed
Loading...
0
Displaced Persons
Loading...
0
Flights Cancelled
Loading...
0
Children Killed
Loading...
Casualties by Day
Civilian Infrastructure Damaged or Destroyed
Historical Comparison — Day 46 of Conflict

Daily Intelligence Briefing

Loading latest briefing...

Previous briefings are preserved in the archive

Enter The Archive ▶

The Record

Every significant event since February 28, 2026. The historical record of Operation Epic Fury.

Why This Exists

You are looking at a war.

Not through the lens of a cable news chyron or the algorithmic feed that buries the death toll beneath outrage bait. You are looking at it through data. Raw, sourced, unfiltered.

Every number on this dashboard represents something real — a dollar extracted from your paycheck, a barrel of oil that won't reach a port, a building that used to be a school, a person who used to be alive.

Signal and Noise

Modern information warfare is not about censorship. It is about volume. Bury the signal in noise. Overwhelm the citizen with so much conflicting data that comprehension becomes impossible and apathy becomes rational.

This dashboard is an attempt at the opposite: take the chaos of a war — airstrikes, market swings, refugee columns, diplomatic posturing — and make it legible. Not simple. Legible. Every data point sourced, every chart connected to the human reality it represents.

The Space Between Data and Understanding

There is a gap between knowing a number and understanding what it means. Between reading "165 killed" and grasping that each was a child who had a favorite color and a laugh their parents will never hear again. Most information systems are designed to keep you on the abstract side of that gap.

This dashboard is designed to pull you across. Not by manipulating you — by attending. By placing every data point in context until the picture becomes too coherent to dismiss and too human to ignore.

Who Has the Right to Know

Intelligence briefings were once prepared exclusively for presidents and generals — the people who start wars. The public that funds them, fights them, and dies in them was given press conferences and talking points.

This dashboard exists on a simple premise: the people who pay for a war have the right to understand it. The real version. With the dollar amounts and the body counts and the displacement figures all in one place, connected, contextualized, and impossible to look away from.

A Note on Violence

This project is fundamentally antiwar. Not strategically, not politically — morally. The act of killing human beings in organized fashion, no matter how justified the stated objective, demands relentless scrutiny rather than patriotic celebration.

We do not take sides between combatants. We take the side of the people caught between them — the families in Minab, the displaced in Lebanon, the service members at Port Shuaiba, the gas station worker in Ohio who doesn't know why her commute suddenly costs $30 more a month.

Data Fidelity

Honesty about what this is and what it isn't:

  • Financial baselines are cross-referenced against FRED, Yahoo Finance, ICE/NYMEX, Treasury FiscalData, COMEX, and EIA. Pre-war values are independently sourced with confidence levels documented in the audit trail. These are the hardest numbers on the dashboard.
  • Conflict data is sourced from ACLED, CENTCOM, DoD press releases, CRS reports, OSINT analysts, and verified satellite imagery. Strike coordinates are approximate. Casualty figures draw from multiple sources that frequently contradict each other — because that is the nature of war reporting.
  • Humanitarian data comes from UNHCR, OCHA, ICRC, WHO, the Iranian Red Crescent, and the Lebanese Health Ministry. Displacement figures are conservative estimates by design.
  • AI-generated content includes timeline descriptions, daily briefings, and some enrichment calculations. These are audited by the creator, but models hallucinate with total confidence — errors survive audits. A detailed correction and verification trail is maintained in the project repository.
  • Update cadence is daily. Each update cycle includes a full audit of all JSON data files against primary sources.
  • No data on this dashboard should be used for financial, military, or life-safety decisions. It is built for comprehension, not action.

The Experiment

This project — a dashboard built largely by AI, citing sources that are themselves contested, published into the same information ecosystem it critiques — is an artifact of the very system it seeks to clarify. That is either a fatal contradiction or the only honest place to start.

Can open-source transparency, radical citation, and good faith produce genuine understanding? Can data, presented with enough context and enough humanity, actually change how someone understands what their government is doing with their money and in their name? The experiment is running. You are part of it now.

Every pair of eyes on this dashboard is a small act of resistance against the strategy of overwhelm.

Contribute

This project is open source. Every line of code, every data pipeline, every editorial decision is public and auditable on GitHub. That is not a feature. It is the point.

If you have domain expertise — conflict data, financial modeling, humanitarian reporting, OSINT, infrastructure, design — we want your eyes on this. Fork the repo. Open an issue. Tell us what we got wrong.

If you don't code, you can still help. Share it. Send it to someone who thinks they understand the war because they watched a panel show, or to someone who stopped paying attention entirely.

Contribute, correct, or just make contact: [email protected]

No ads. No sponsors. No agenda except clarity.

Built using Latent Dialogic Space

[email protected]

VII. Contributors

The Working Group

An interdisciplinary collective of researchers, clinicians, engineers, and analysts assembling open-source intelligence on the 2026 U.S.–Iran conflict.

Working Group IranWar.ai
Mandate Radical Transparency · Nonviolent Philosophy · The Word against The Flood
Standing Order Daily Audit · Open Source · No Sponsors
Established March 2026
Portrait of Dr. Jacob E. Thomas
FIG. 01 · Principal Investigator
RolePrincipal Investigator
FieldHealth Behavior · Epidemiology · Information Environments
DegreeMA, PhD
BaseAustin, TX
Member 01 / 04

Jacob E. Thomas, MA, PhD

Principal Investigator · IranWar.ai Working Group

Jacob E. Thomas, MA, PhD studies how information environments shape mental health, behavior, and access to opportunity. His academic research interrogates the mechanisms by which corporations that profit from harmful products (e.g., tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages) use media strategically to influence vulnerable populations, particularly youth, low-income communities, and historically marginalized groups. For more than a decade, he has worked among the largest and most consequential hospitals in the country (i.e., Parkland Psychiatry in Dallas, Bellevue Emergency Department in Lower Manhattan, NewYork-Presbyterian Behavioral Medicine Division in Washington Heights) and in university laboratories at NYU, Columbia University, and across the University of Texas System, contributing to NIH-, CDC-, and DoD-funded research grants awarded to various principal investigators totaling well over $50 million. He holds a PhD in Health Behavior from the University of Texas at Austin and an MA in Clinical Psychology from Columbia University. His research has been recognized by numerous awards and fellowships including The Nathaniel Wharton Fund, the UT-Austin College of Education, the Society for Prevention Research, the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, and Teachers College.

In the technology industry, he serves as a Data Scientist and AI Strategist at one of the world's leading privately held recruitment marketing companies, where he directs a research lab studying the structural informational forces that degrade labor market conditions and, by extension, access to healthcare under the U.S. employer-mediated model. His work in this space has been recognized by the U.S. Army Recruiting Command and as a multi-time finalist for the Digital Job Advertising Excellence Award.

Beyond academia and industry, Dr. Thomas develops open-source research tools and intelligence platforms that aim to make the noise of the Information Flood (i.e., the media crisis fueled by synthetic data and inhumane algorithms) less overwhelming while actively critiquing the environment itself. His publicly available projects span conflict intelligence, AI-mediated historical dialogue, and the democratization of data science, each built on the conviction that the populations most affected by information asymmetry deserve access to the same quality of analysis as those who manage it.

The best part of his life is the hours spent at the park during open-sky Texas sunrises with his daughter, during watercolor Hill Country sunsets with his wife and dog, and in solitude reflecting on the spiritual dimensions of life.

FIG. 02 · Co-Investigator
RoleCo-Investigator
FieldPolitical Science · Conflict Research
DegreePhD
BaseNew York, NY
Member 02 / 04

Prakhar Sharma, PhD

Co-Investigator · IranWar.ai Working Group

Prakhar Sharma, PhD is a political scientist based in New York City. He holds a PhD in Political Science from the Maxwell School at Syracuse University (2025) and brings 18+ years of experience producing field-based political risk analysis and applied research for U.S. government, NATO, and allied partners across 28 countries.

Dr. Sharma built his career in conflict research starting at the International Centre for Political Violence & Terrorism Research (ICPVTR) in Singapore, before moving to Kabul where he led research at a local conflict analysis center, directing 15 initiatives on insurgent networks, Taliban governance, and political violence, with analysis cited in U.S. and UN strategic assessments. He subsequently directed DoD-funded research on terrorism support and government legitimacy across 14 Afghan provinces, delivering threat assessments and briefings directly to U.S. military commands in Afghanistan, and conducted field research for UNICEF and the World Bank across Afghanistan's most insecure provinces.

He then managed DoD- and NSF-funded RCTs at Yale University's Political Violence FieldLab on insurgent influence and aid effectiveness, and served as a Stimson Center Visiting Fellow where he briefed the White House Deputy National Security Advisor, Congressional staff, and the State Department on Afghanistan insurgency dynamics. Most recently he served as Senior Specialist for Evaluation and Research at the International Republican Institute (IRI), directing CVE and conflict prevention research across 26 fragile states.

Across his career he has led 30+ research initiatives in conflict and transitional settings.

Portrait of Eugene Osei Mensah
FIG. 03 · Associate Data Scientist
RoleAssociate Data Scientist
FieldNursing Informatics · Health Data Science
DegreeBSN, RN
BaseGhana
Member 03 / 04

Eugene Osei Mensah, BSN, RN

Associate Data Scientist · IranWar.ai Working Group

Eugene Osei Mensah, BSN, RN is a registered nurse and emerging researcher whose work bridges clinical practice, health systems, and the application of data science to humanitarian challenges. His clinical background with the Ghana Health Service has grounded him in the realities of health system delivery, while his research interests in nursing informatics and machine learning orient him toward the structural and computational dimensions of healthcare that most clinicians never encounter.

He contributes to the IranWar.ai project as a research collaborator, performing data quality assurance, reference verification, and the analysis of conflict-related information through a clinical nursing and public health lens. He focuses on bringing clinical reasoning to bear on the problem of how civilian populations are affected by armed conflict directly and indirectly.

Eugene is building an interdisciplinary research portfolio at the intersection of nursing science, informatics, and applied health data science, with the goal of designing intelligent and equitable health systems, particularly in complicated humanitarian settings where traditional infrastructure has failed.

FIG. 04 · Associate Research Analyst
RoleAssociate Research Analyst
FieldCivil Engineering · Business Analytics
DegreeBSc, MSc
BaseZimbabwe
Member 04 / 04

Nigel Masara, BSc, MSc

Associate Research Analyst · IranWar.ai Working Group

Nigel Masara, BSc, MSc is a civil engineer and business-analytics researcher affiliated with the University of Zimbabwe. He holds a BSc in Civil Engineering, grounded by five years of applied work in infrastructure research and implementation, and an MSc in Business Analytics with specialized training in data science, natural language processing, artificial intelligence, and large language models. This dual foundation (i.e., structural systems in the physical world and computational methods for analyzing those systems) positions him to investigate the intersection of the built environment and open-source intelligence.

Within the IranWar.ai Working Group, Nigel examines the secondary morbidity and mortality that follow damage to civil infrastructure (e.g., power plants, water treatment facilities, and other essential systems whose disruption produces casualties long after the initial strike). His orientation toward the project is unambiguous: the welfare of every life caught inside the conflict is paramount, and real-time data on the condition of infrastructure is indispensable to the decisions that protect those lives.

This work is an extension of his broader research commitments: to place rigorous data analysis in direct service of people whose lives are at stake, and to apply the methods of contemporary data science for the greater good.

The names above are accountable to the data published on this dashboard. Errors are theirs to correct; corrections are public by design.

Direct correspondence: [email protected]